National Advocacy Center
  • Who We Are
    • About
    • Staff & Advisory Board
    • Partners
    • Good Shepherd Sisters
    • Of Note News >
      • Of Note Archives 2022
      • Of Note Archives 2021
      • Of Note Archives 2020
      • Of Note Archives 2019
      • Of Note Archives 2018
      • Of Note Archives 2017
      • Of Note Archives 2016
      • Of Note Archives 2015
    • Contact
  • Act for Justice
    • Road to Justice
    • Human Trafficking Conference >
      • HT Packet & Digital Toolkit
    • Giving
    • Outreach
  • Issues
    • Central America
    • Economic Justice
    • End Racism
    • Human Trafficking >
      • Know the Signs
      • Trafficking Resources
    • Immigration & Refugees
    • Muslim Relations
    • Women & Children
  • Resources
    • Advocacy Tools
    • Analysis for Action
    • Poetry Library

Peeling an Onion

11/12/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Like an onion, as one layer in the food-climate crisis relationship is peeled away, another is exposed. Food is at once easy and complex to understand when we peel the layers to look at food production, transportation, processing, preparation and waste.
 
There is no question that these areas and activities are having an effect on the environment and ultimately on our climate.
 
At each step of our food chain (production, transportation, processing, and waste), there are complex confluences of environmental factors which contribute to climate change. Tatiana Schlossberg’s Inconspicuous Consumption: The Environmental Impact You Don’t Know You Have, is an insightful read.
 
For instance, Schlossberg named corn as the most important and problematic crop because of its many uses. While corn feeds humans, a vastly greater percentage of corn is used as grain to feed animals and to create alcohol, sweeteners and other items. Corn also is used to create ethanol that supplements gasoline to fuel vehicles.
 
Each use of corn, like the peeling of an onion, has its own trail of consequences. Schlossberg, a New York Times writer, does fine work in laying out the parameters of the problems without drilling down unnecessarily.
 
Another layer has us examining beef, which we all know is harmful to the environment. Cow “burps,” as Schlossberg correctly explains, release methane, a key greenhouse gas. 

Picture
​In the middle ages, only the rich could afford to eat meat and meat products. Lower classes and the poor relied largely on grains, and ironically were healthier than the aristocrats. Gout was rampant among the rich, but rare among the peasants.
 
What to do?  Solutions range from cutting back beef consumption to eliminating it and all meats entirely. Animal proteins can easily be substituted with vegetable proteins. But are proteins the only things that meats provide to the diet or do meats offer something more?
 
​So what do we do? 
  • Individually, we can make different food choices.
  • Within our local and faith-based communities, we can invest in community gardens and support others through food drives.
  • At the local, state and federal level, we might require action and enforcement on food-related environmental laws and addressing hunger.
 
Some food for thought –
  • Go meatless one day a week – Meatless Mondays.
  • How about reducing our meat consumption to three days a week?
  • Go local – limit consumption to locally produced meats.
  • Switch to almond-based milk options. Still though, it takes two gallons of water to produce a single almond.
  • Support funding to identify or develop animal feeds that don’t produce methane. Initial results hold promise.
 
Each choice apparently entails trade-offs; some are not yet known and many are only partially understood. If I learned anything from Tatiana Schlossberg's work, it is that much more research is needed. Viable and reasoned alternatives must be energetically investigated and widely disseminated. Until then, concentrating efforts on reducing carbon-dioxide seems to have the best chance of success in countering climate change.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    John "Jack" Lawlor, Jr., is Professor of History Emeritus at Reading (PA) Area Community College. He firmly believes all people have an obligation to be good stewards of the earth, hand down a healthy planet to the next generation, and prepare them to do the same.


    RSS Feed

    From the Sisters....

    Good Shepherd priorities are outlined in a series of Position Papers that have their source in the spirituality, vision, mission, and heritage of the Congregation .  Read or print the 2018 Position Paper on the Integral Ecology by clicking here.  To read or print the complete series, click here.  ​For more background on the Good Shepherd 2018 Position Papers and to access them in Spanish, French or English, visit this site.
    Want more? Sign up for updates, resources, action alerts. Rise Up & Act for Justice.
    Sign Up

    Archives

    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019

    Categories

    All

NAC Quick Links

Ways to Act

Reach out to your elected officials and others on important policy decisions impacting the common good.
Act for Justice

Stay Informed

​Our email network alerts you to legislative news and directly connects you with lawmakers.
Sign Up

Advocacy Tools

Learn how to personally advocate for change and access other advocacy resources.
Access Tools

Our Issues

We advocate for laws that benefit the marginalized, especially families, women and children.  
Learn More

Contact

National Advocacy Center
of the Sisters of the Good Shepherd

504 Hexton Hill Road
​Silver Spring, MD  20904

Phone 301.622.6838 | Fax 301.384.1025
E-mail us
© COPYRIGHT 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Website design adapted and modified by Perisphere Media.