Immigration legislation
is moving forward quickly in the Senate. Senator Specter, chairman of the Senate
Judiciary Committee, has prepared a bill (his “Chairman’s Mark”) which is currently being debated in the
committee. The committee is hoping to have the bill voted out and onto the Senate
Floor by March 27th. It is critical that the Judiciary Committee produce
a comprehensive immigration reform bill by this date because, if not, Senator Frist (the Senate majority leader) has threatened
to bring a bill he has introduced to the floor instead—one along the lines of the House bill (H.R. 4437) that is punitive
and narrowly focused on border security.
What is contained in Senator Specter’s Chairman’s Mark?
Brief
summary:
Enforcement
-
Criminalizes unlawful presence
- Makes it a crime to “facilitate” the illegal
entry of undocumented persons - a provision broad enough to jeopardize the work of non-profit organizations and churches
- Restricts
judicial review which would limit immigrants’ ability to access the courts
Temporary
worker provisions
- Would allow for people to come to
the US to work for two terms of three years each
- After end of second three-year term,
the worker would have to return to his/her home country
- Would not allow workers to adjust
to legal status
- Would not allow workers to be unemployed
for more than 45 days
- Children and spouses of workers can
come to the US but would not be able to
work
Non-conditional
immigrant worker status – “Gold Card”
- Would
be for undocumented workers currently in the US
who were working on January 4, 2004
- The
status would last indefinitely if immigrant workers remained continuously employed but they would not be able to gain legal
status
- Spouses and children of those eligible for the
non-conditional immigrant worker status who were not working on January
4, 2004 would be permitted to stay in the US
but not be eligible to work
- Workers who lose their jobs and do not find employment
within 45 days would lose their status and have to leave the country
Problems and concerns with Sen. Specter’s bill:
· The
bill does not create an earned path to citizenship for undocumented workers.
· Advocates
are concerned that the non-conditional immigrant worker status would create a permanent group of second-class workers
· Non-conditional immigrant worker and temporary worker statuses
would likely be unworkable (e.g., it is not reasonable to only allow 45 days to find another job if someone in this status
loses their job)
· The legislation does not adequately meet the needs of undocumented
students.
· The
enforcement provisions closely mirror the punitive measures in HR 4437, the immigration bill passed by the House
For a more detailed
analysis visit the National Immigration Law Center.
What is happening now?
Since March 2nd,
the Senate Judiciary Committee has been meeting several days a week to debate Specter’s bill. Amendments have been offered to change certain provisions of the Specter bill and there has been much debate
about whether the bill should criminalize those who are here unlawfully and those who aid undocumented people, whether there
should be an earned legalization program for undocumented people and what kind of temporary worker program there should be.
Some negative amendments
that were voted for and that passed:
- to expand expedited
removal (offered by Senator Coburn)
- to expand of mandatory
detention (offered by Senator Sessions)
- to put up more
border fences (offered by Senator Kyl)
Some positive amendments
that were offered, but not voted on:
- to strike the
provision that would criminalize the status of being undocumented (offered by Senator Durbin)
- to strike the
provision that would criminalize giving humanitarian assistance to the undocumented (offered by Durbin)
*It is possible
that Senator Durbin will introduce the DREAM Act as an amendment.
The meeting held
by the Judiciary Committee on March 16th is viewed by many advocates as a real breakthrough. The discussion over Senator Kennedy’s proposal to allow undocumented people to earn legalization
showed progress and it seemed that there was a commitment by Senators Kennedy and Cornyn to reach an agreement about a temporary
worker program that would allow certain individuals to adjust their status. Committee
staff members will continue to negotiate the details during the congressional recess (March 20-24) and committee members have
agreed to come back on March 27th to vote on some of these important provisions.
What’s ahead?
Once the Judiciary
Committee votes the immigration bill out of committee, it should go to the Senate floor for a vote. However, it remains unclear whether Senator Frist will honor the committee’s work or bring his enforcement-only
bill to the floor instead (a potential move that has brought sharp criticism from other senators). In either case, additional amendments may be offered on the floor that could further change the legislation. After the Senate votes on the bill, it will go to a conference committee so that differences
can be worked out between the Senate immigration bill and the House immigration bill (HR 4437) which was passed last December. It will be difficult for a pro-immigrant, comprehensive bill to come out of the conference
committee given the provisions included in HR 4437, but immigrant advocacy groups will continue to push for compassionate
and effective immigration reforms.
What can I do?
1.
Call your senators, especially if they are on the Judiciary Committee*. The Capitol Hill Switchboard number is 202-224-3121. Urge
them to support pro immigrant legislation that would:
- support earned legalization for undocumented
immigrants
- NOT criminalize those who are undocumented
and those who aid the undocumented
If your
Senator is Arlen Specter (PA), call his office and:
- applaud and encourage him to continue along the
path of comprehensive immigration reform
- support bi-partisan proposals such as the McCain-Kennedy
legalization program and the worker program with a path to residency
If your
Senator is Bill Frist (TN), call his office to urge him:
-
NOT to set arbitrary deadlines for the Judiciary Committee
-
to respect judicial process
-
to support earned legalization
* Senators on the
Judiciary Committee:
Arlen
Specter (R-PA)
Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
Charles
Grassley (R-IA) Mike DeWine (R-OH)
Lindsey
Graham (R-SC) John Cornyn (R-TX)
Sam Brownback
(R-KS) Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
Edward
M. Kennedy (D-MA)
Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-DE)
Herbert
H. Kohl (D-WI)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Russ Feingold
(D-WI)
Charles E. Schumer (D-NY)
2.
Take part in local actions: for a list of rallies and other activities for comprehensive immigration reform taking
place in your city, click here. You may want to check back periodically
as the list of actions will continue to be updated.