House Budget Resolution
Tax Cuts
No House Budget Vote Yet
As of May 5th,
the House of Representatives still hasn’t brought its budget resolution to the floor. Republican leaders continue to
negotiate with moderate Republicans who are demanding increases in domestic discretionary spending (for health, education,
and human services) and conservatives who want to change the rules that govern the budget process (see budget process “reforms”
below). News of a potential deal recently surfaced that would involve shifting
roughly $4 billion from defense and international aid accounts to the labor, education, health and human services appropriations
bill, but key moderate leaders appear to be holding out for the full $7.2 billion they requested earlier in the year. Even this larger increase, however, will only bring
funding back to FY2005 levels without adjusting for inflation.
Majority Leader Boehner has
indicated that there will be a vote on the budget before the Memorial Day recess and it is possible that there will be enough
votes to pass it. However, it remains unlikely that the House and Senate will
be able to negotiate a compromise between their competing budget resolutions (see the previous budget update for information on the Senate budget resolution). This does not mean
that the annual spending bills will not move forward, it just ensures that the appropriations process will again be contentious
and will likely involve additional cuts.
What’s In the House Budget Resolution?
The House budget resolution
closely follows the President’s FY2007 budget proposal and includes deep cuts to a variety of domestic social programs. Like
the President’s budget the pretense for the budget cuts is “deficit reduction,” but the resolution also
calls for additional tax breaks that erase any “savings” the budget cuts achieve.
According to calculations from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the House budget includes $228 billion in tax cuts and significant increases in military spending that will increase
deficits by a quarter of a trillion dollars over the next five years—over what they would be if current policies remained
in effect.
Overall, the House budget
resolution:
- Cuts over $10 billion from the level of funding needed to keep domestic discretionary programs operating
at current levels (which have already been reduced from previous years). These
cuts include deep reductions in the Social Services, Community Development, and Community Services Block Grants, child care
assistance, job training, and environmental programs, and the largest dollar cut to federal education funding in the 27-year
history of the Education Department.
- It is nearly $12 billion below the Senate funding level. The
Senate added funding to bring discretionary programs back to their FY2005 levels.
- Domestic discretionary funding is slightly higher than what was proposed by the President because the
House Budget Committee shifted roughly $2 billion from international programs to domestic programs (i.e. foreign assistance
is cut by $2 billion). The overall discretionary cap matches the President’s
at $873 billion ($463 billion of this is for the Pentagon)
Thus, the House budget plan
assumes most of the cuts proposed in the President’s budget and provides less foreign humanitarian assistance than requested by the President. Defense funding in the House budget resolution is currently equal to that requested by the President and
makes up over 50% of discretionary spending even before accounting for the costs of on-going military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The House budget resolution
also calls for an additional $7 billion in cuts to mandatory programs – some
$4 billion of which could come from the committee that oversees programs such as Supplemental Security Income, the Earned
Income Tax Credit, and other programs benefiting low-income families and individuals that were targeted in last year’s
budget reconciliation process. In addition, the House budget fails to include
funding requested by the President to extend Transitional Medicaid Assistance (a program that allows families moving off of
welfare to keep Medicaid coverage for up to a year) and to fill a shortfall in funding for the State Children’s Health
Insurance Program (SCHIP). If additional money is not provided for SCHIP, the
actuary at the Department of Health and Human Services has estimated that enrollment could fall by 500,000 in FY2007.
For more details on the House
budget, please visit the Coalition on Human Needs or the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
What Happens If the House Doesn’t Pass A Budget?
Even if the House isn’t
able to pass a budget resolution, Congress can still move ahead with all of the annual spending bills. Advocates will be paying close attention to funding levels and working to prevent cuts in human needs programs. Given the higher funding levels proposed by the Senate, every spending bill will likely
be very contentious and the budget process will likely carry over past the fall elections.
The good news is that no overall budget agreement means that Congress cannot pass more fast-track tax cuts or entitlement
cuts like those included in the FY2006 budget (budget reconciliation).
Tax Cuts
Deal Reached on Tax Reconciliation
Ever since Congress passed
its package of budget reconciliation spending cuts earlier this year, Congressional leaders have been pushing for an agreement on the other half of reconciliation
– more tax cuts. According to recent reports, House and Senate negotiators
have reached such an agreement and a conference report could be brought to the floor before the end of May. The agreement includes roughly $70 billion in additional tax cuts (extending reductions in capital gains
and dividend tax rates) that are once again heavily skewed toward higher-income households.
According to estimates from
the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center this tax bill will give middle class households and average tax cut of $20, while millionaires (0.2% of the population)
will receive a tax break of $42,000 on average. It also contains a number of complicated budget gimmicks that hide the true
cost of the bill and deepen deficits in the future – leaving massive debt for future generations.
It is important to highlight
these tax cuts because they point to the heart of what is wrong with current budget priorities—they squander revenues
for much needed social investments and exacerbate the already widening income disparities in America. In fact, the very reason that there were two reconciliation bills (one for spending
and one for taxes) was to try to hide the fact that the cuts to programs serving lower-income members of society are being
made to help finance more tax breaks for the most affluent Americans, NOT to reduce the deficit.
All of the
cuts to Medicaid, child support, foster care and other programs that passed earlier this year were justified as a means of reducing the deficit. However, these cuts were really just an attempt to divert attention from
the fact that the reconciliation tax cuts will actually put the budget further in the red. And, while low- and middle-income families bear
the brunt of the budget cuts, nearly all of the benefits of these tax cuts would go to high-income families. NETWORK has produced a helpful comparison (PDF) of budget cuts and tax cuts to put the issue in perspective.
For additional
facts about our current tax situation, please visit the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (PDF).
Estate Tax
(Coming soon)
NAC Position
It is disappointing that
we find ourselves hoping that the budget processes will break down or that tax cuts won’t pass, but it is a testament
to how far off track our priorities have become. Every year for the past four
years poverty rates, the number of uninsured, and income inequality have grown, yet Congress continues to push for tax cuts
and ever increasing military spending that squeeze out funding for the programs that support the most vulnerable members in
society and promote opportunity for all.
At the National Advocacy
Center, our grounding in the Gospel and Catholic social teaching reminds us that another way is possible—a way that
brings good news to the poor, healing to the sick, and promotes reconciliation within our borders and abroad. With congressional elections coming up this fall, it is vital that we continue to lift up this vision and
remind all candidates that budget decisions are also about values.
Catholic Social Teaching
Economic Justice for All: Pastoral Letter on Catholic Social Teaching and the U.S. Economy, U.S. Catholic
Bishops, 1986
10th Anniversary Reflection on Economic Justice for All, National Conference of Catholic Bishops, 1995
Standing on the Side of Justice: A Reflection for the 20th Anniversary of Economic Justice for All from the Center of Concern, 2006
Catholic Social Teaching and the Budget - NETWORK
Additional Links
Faith Reflection on Taxation (PDF file)
NETWORK: A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities